🔗 Share this article

Tehran is prepared to reinitiate atomic negotiations with Washington on condition that it is treated with "respect" and "respect", Tehran's foreign minister has announced.

Abbas Araghchi stated only diplomacy worked, and shared recent overtures had come from go-betweens to reopen talks with the American leadership. He claimed Iran had zero undeclared nuclear sites, and Tehran had not yet reached a point to authorize the global atomic watchdog to inspect struck enrichment centers for security reasons.

Walking a Challenging Course

Araghchi is walking a difficult course since Iran aims to avoid be perceived to be operating from a stance of vulnerability, and he emphatically stated that Iran had come out more resilient defensively and psychologically from the joint assault on its nuclear sites in June.

He was talking at a security conference in Tehran where he reiterated that Iran had "an inalienable right to enrich uranium domestically that it will never give up" – the main reason of the stalemate in the prior discussions.

Previous Discussions Suddenly Concluded

The prior phases of negotiations between the US and Iran were ended suddenly and hostile termination on 12 June when Israel, with Washington's assistance, attacked Tehran's atomic facilities in a two-week conflict that concluded with Donald Trump declaring the locations had been destroyed. Following this, Western states used their right to reinstate international penalties, but Iran insists they have not had a substantial consequence.

Perfect Agreement Offered

Iranian officials stated they felt they had achieved a "ideal resolution" to the uranium processing matter in prior discussions, when it was settled an domestic cooperative with Washington's engagement could enrich uranium. Both sides would have been able to claim victory since local refinement would have remained and the US could be assured that Iran's atomic project was entirely non-military.

It had not been settled in the discussions that US nuclear scientists could operate within Iranian territory, but that was a logical implication of the partnership suggestion. Officials claimed three times they had secured an understanding with the US representative Steve Witkoff only for the arrangement to fall apart due to "spoilers in Washington".

Existing Status

Tehran representatives declared the consortium offer was now no longer available, but it seems highly likely the proposal could be resurrected in certain ways if discussions resume.

The American leader recently said he had been receiving messages that Iran wanted to restart talks, but confidentially Iran's diplomats claim they are not yet getting clear proposals from America either directly or from key regional mediators, such as the Qatari government, the Egyptian leadership, the Omani authorities and Saudi Arabia. The Iranian foreign ministry has been accused of passivity in the face of Washington's unmediated tactics, but Tehran asserts diplomacy is not part of a show.

Negotiating Position

In his remarks to the forum, intended to portray the US as a dominant force that exploits the notion of international law, Araghchi said the 12-day war showed the conflict could not be resolved by armed force. He asserted the assaults began with a US demand for an complete Tehran capitulation and ended with an complete request for a halt to hostilities.

Iran is assured the opening assaults from Tel Aviv were mounted with complete American awareness and collaboration, making trust challenging to rebuild.

Dialogue Stays the Ultimate Solution

The foreign minister declared: "Tehran was not the one that had deserted negotiations; it was the United States and the western countries that had repeatedly sought to impose their will during the talks. Negotiations can still be active and remains the primary solution to settle conflicts, but its requirements, guidelines and tenets must be followed."

"Provided that they speak to the citizens of Tehran with the tone of dignity and respect, they will obtain a answer in the identical tone."

Recovery and Recovery

In what is described by Iran's diplomats as the conflict of restoration and reconstruction, the foreign minister said he was assured Iran's defence capabilities "have significantly improved than preceding 13 or 14 June of this year. Every aspect of our defense have been rebuilt. We learned multiple understandings from this engagement; we have come to know our own weaknesses and the vulnerabilities of the adversary."

He stated: "We effectively endured this conflict. Our atomic expertise, which they aimed to obliterate, continues to exist. The sites and gear, if destroyed, will be rebuilt; what is essential is the resolve of the Iranian people and then the national cohesion that they targeted, but were unable to break. The nation of Iran have grown more powerful, more united, and more backing of the government and the nation in the aftermath of this invasion."